First Reference company logo

Inside Internal Controls

News and discussion on implementing risk management

machine cogs image

Competition

Competition law issues for HR Professionals in Canada

Competition law

A company’s HR functions, such as recruitment and compensation, are not typically regarded as antitrust “hot spots” (as opposed to sales and marketing). Recent cases in the United States, however, highlight how hiring practices can create the risk of competition law violations for companies and their HR personnel. Since Canadian competition law is similar to U.S. antitrust law in these respects, it is important that Canadian HR professionals be aware of these risks and protect themselves and their companies from exposure.

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Top 10 most read Inside Internal Controls posts 2016 & Season’s Greetings

We are signing off with a list of the top 10 most read Inside Internal Controls posts 2016. Privacy issues and director’s liability seem to have been hot topics this year with several blog posts on the topics making it on the list. The top 10 most read Inside Internal Controls posts 2016 Director’s liability […]

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

CASL made clearer: First CRTC decision released

Until now, the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission’s CASL enforcement actions have taken the form of settlements reached in confidential negotiations between the Enforcement Branch and the company. But this decision, released on October 26, 2016, is significant because it is the first CASL enforcement decision to provide guidance on compliance. The decision contains several important lessons about regulation of commercial electronic messages in Canada before class action enforcement opens on July 1, 2017.

 

, , , , , , ,

CRTC’s reminder on record-keeping for CASL compliance

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission issued an enforcement advisory directing businesses and individuals to consider the importance of record-keeping pursuant to Canada’s anti-spam legislation (CASL). Under CASL, the onus remains on the sender of commercial electronic messages (CEMs) to demonstrate that it had the proper consents in place to send CEMs (whether implied or explicit).

 

, , , , ,

Proving consent under CASL: CRTC issues enforcement advisory notice

The Canadian Radio–television and Telecommunications Commission has issued an Enforcement Advisory notice directed to businesses and individuals that send commercial electronic messages (CEMs) as part of their commercial activities. Notably, the sender of CEMs must have the consent of the recipient to send them a message, or else the message is considered spam.

 

, , , , ,

Risk and how we run our business

I am going to use a metaphor involving the board game of Monopoly to illustrate how I feel about risk management. The players compete to win by either having more money when the game ends (if there is a time limit) or by being the only one left standing after all the others have gone bankrupt. Let’s imagine our executive team is playing a game against its main competitors.

 

, , , , , ,

The art of restraint

A restrictive covenant is a class of legal “promise” imposing a restriction on one party for the benefit of another. When drafted correctly, restrictive covenants are an invaluable tool to protect your business.

 

, , , , , , ,

Private right of action under Canada’s Anti-Spam Law (CASL)

As of July 1, 2017, individuals and organizations will be entitled to institute a “private right of action” before the courts against those that contravene certain provisions of Canada’s Anti-Spam Law (“CASL”). In the event of a contravention of the message rules in CASL, a monetary penalty up to a maximum of $1,000,000 per day may be imposed. This private right of action should be taken seriously right now. From this perspective and building on previous publications, this bulletin discusses this new mechanism.

 

, , , , , , , , ,

Be aware of potential liabilities when buying a business

In a recent decision, Gestion F. Lessard inc. v. Bournival, the Superior Court of Québec observed the potential liabilities involved in share purchase transactions — such as threats of litigation by unsatisfied customers, employee conflicts and software malfunction — and reminded us that not all potential liabilities can be imputed on the seller for fraud.

 

, , , , , , , , , ,

Anti-money laundering updates

Final amendments to Regulations to the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act released.

 

, , , , , , , , ,

How to get Alberta, Canada’s green-energy pioneer, back in the saddle – The Globe and Mail

The farms and ranches in southern Alberta may not seem like fertile ground for the early adoption of new energy technology. However, southern Alberta is where Canada’s commercial wind energy industry got its start. Recently, other provinces have offered lucrative long-term contracts to attract renewable energy. Although Alberta has great wind and solar resources, a combination of low power prices and lack of such incentives has made it difficult to develop renewable-energy projects in the province. With new policies, can Alberta, Canada’s renewable energy pioneer, get back in the saddle?

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Seggie v. Roofdog Games Inc.: Who is the author of videogame software for copyright purposes?

Last December, the Quebec Superior Court issued its decision in Seggie v. Roofdog Games Inc.[1], in which it attempted to clarify the notion of co-authorship (and by implication, copyright ownership) of a videogame. This case marks the first time that the issue of authorship of a videogame was ever considered by a Canadian court (and one of the very few Canadian cases to consider authorship of software more generally).

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“Do Not Call” means Do Not Call: CRTC enters into MOU with FTC on Spam and Unsolicited Telecommunications

On March 24, 2016, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (“CRTC”) signed a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) with the United States Federal Trade Commission.[1] This MOU is an effort by Canada and the United States to work together on anti-spam enforcement measures, and expressly refers to unsolicited telecommunications, unsolicited commercial electronic messages (spam), and other unlawful electronic threats (e.g., malware and botnets).

 

, , , , , ,

Internal audit: Essential to minimizing risk

Managing risk in today’s business environment has become a far more complex process than it ever has been. This can be attributed to a number of factors, such as increased government regulation and cyber-based issues. Other factors include uncertain political and economic situations that can arise, sustainable development and environmental concerns. These issues can have a substantial impact on small, medium and large organizations.

 

, , , , ,

Marketing to Canadians – A plethora of regulatory considerations

Businesses marketing to Canadians may be surprised at the number and scope of laws that may impact marketing efforts. Previous Releases provided updated coverage of some of these laws, including privacy and anti-spam laws. This Release updates Policy OP 6.12 – Do Not Call Registry, which includes coverage of the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules that govern telemarketing activities. Listed below are 7 of the many considerations that businesses marketing to Canadians must consider. Some will be explored in detail in upcoming Releases:

 

, , , , , , , ,

Previous Posts Next posts